OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED
Cognitive Study
| Published: January 30, 2017
Comparative Study of Visual & Auditory Memory between Psychology & Non-Psychology Students: Testing a Stream Hypothesis
Associate Professor & HOD, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amity University Gwalior, M.P, India Google Scholar More about the auther
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Amity University, Gwalior, M.P, India Google Scholar More about the auther
DIP: 18.01.029/20170402
DOI: 10.25215/0402.029
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The process of retention and storage of any kind of information is known as Memory. Present study was conducted to compare the Visual & Auditory Short term memory (STM) in Psychology & Non psychology Students. Materials and Methods: After appropriate consent from students and department. The study comprised of 60 students (30 Psychology, 30 non-psychology/other stream students ) aged 16-20 years of Amity University Gwalior, M.P included ,students having infirmities (Visual or Auditory) were excluded. Reaction time for audiovisual exposures to recalling is noted in all ten subtests. Results: There is a strong difference between the retention and storing capacity of visual STM and auditory STM among both groups. Results: There is a strong difference between the retention and storing capacity of visual STM and auditory STM (p<0.001) between both groups. The mean reaction time is more for long words/sentences than short words. Short words are remembered more accurately than long words by both groups. Interpretation and Conclusion: The visual STM has a short mean reaction time and more accuracy than auditory STM. STM and working memory plays an important role in the learning processes of both groups of undergraduate students.
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2017 Sharma R, Sharma V
Received: December 30, 2016; Revision Received: January 19, 2017; Accepted: January 30, 2017
Article Overview
ISSN 2348-5396
ISSN 2349-3429
18.01.029/20170402
10.25215/0402.029
Download: 33
View: 1359
Published in Volume 04, Issue 2, January-March, 2017