OPEN ACCESS

PEER-REVIEWED

Original Study

| Published: December 04, 2022

Development of the Challenging Behavior Rating Scale: An Instrument to Assess the Challenging Behaviors in Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Janaki Balakrishnan

Ph. D Research Scholar (2014-2018), Department of Applied Psychology & Behavioural Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Google Scholar More about the auther

, Waheeda Matheen

Associate Professor & Head of the Department of Applied Psychology & Behavioural Research Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Google Scholar More about the auther

DIP: 18.01.075.20221004

DOI: 10.25215/1004.075

ABSTRACT

Challenging behaviors are highly prevalent in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), but the screening and early identification of such behaviors are the most neglected part of the assessment, despite there have been plethora of behavioral intervention studies for challenging behaviors as part of clinical management. A need for broad band screening instrument to assess the challenging behaviors is warranted to increase the knowledge base and to create tiered provision of services. Initial scale items were generated from semi-structured interviews with parents and teachers, and through expert review. The challenging behaviors were further measured in three dimensions namely frequency, intensity and management, which were combined into a single score based on the coding scheme developed by a team of practitioners. The scale was validated through exploratory factor analyses by administering it on a sample of 620 individuals with IDD and thus establishing the five-factor structure and scale reliability. Challenging Behavior Rating Scale (CBRS), the tool developed in the present study consists of 40 items grouped under five subscales: Aggression to People/Objects (9 items), Self-Aggression/Stimulation (11 items), Odd/ Repetitive (9 items), Socially Inappropriate (8 items) and Deviant (3 items). The present study paves way for reaffirming the model through confirmatory factor analyses and with more psychometric evidences.

Download Full Text
Responding Author Information

Janaki Balakrishnan @ janaki_balakrishnan@hotmail.com

Find On

Article Overview

ISSN 2348-5396

ISSN 2349-3429

18.01.075.20221004

10.25215/1004.075

Download: 7

View: 391

Published in   Volume 10, Issue 4, October-December, 2022