OPEN ACCESS

PEER-REVIEWED

Comparative Study

| Published: September 09, 2025

A Comparative Study on Lecture and Al-Based Methods in Teaching Science and its Effectiveness on Students’ Academic Motivation, Academic Anxiety and Academic Achievement of the Adolescents in Rural Areas

Dr. Pragati Sureka

Teaching Assistant, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Google Scholar More about the auther

, Dr. Rajkumari Basu

MA, PhD, Practising Clinical Psychologist, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Google Scholar More about the auther

, Anupam Bandyopadhyay

MA (Psychology), MA (Education), B.Ed, M.Ed, PGDEMA Google Scholar More about the auther

DIP: 18.01.293.20251303

DOI: 10.25215/1303.293

ABSTRACT

Introduction and Background: AI is increasingly recognized as a transformative tool in education. This study addresses the need for a comprehensive examination of its effects on academic outcomes, motivation, and anxiety. The significance lies in AI’s potential to enhance learning experiences, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive functions. Methods: Sixty rural students participated, undergoing a pre-post-test design. Academic achievement was assessed through a Google Forms multiple-choice test. Ethical considerations were ensured, and students were placed into two groups at random. The pre-test conditions established baseline equivalence. In the post-test phase, one group experienced traditional lectures, while the other utilized an AI-based tool, ChatGPT. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and Pearson’s correlation, were employed. Results: The study’s pre-test conditions revealed no notable differences in Academic Motivation (AM), Academic Anxiety (AAnx), and Academic Achievement (AAch) within the Control and Experimental groups. Post-test results indicated consistent AM levels between groups, but the Control group exhibited higher AAnx, while the Experimental group showed increased AAch. Comparing pre-test to post-test conditions, no significant changes in AM were observed in either group. However, the Control group experienced heightened AAnx, while the Experimental group demonstrated enhanced AAch. Correlation analyses unveiled a non-significant negative relationship between AM and AAnx in both groups, and a non-significant positive relationship between AAnx and AAch. Noteworthy, the Control group showed a weak negative relationship between AAch and AM, whereas the Experimental group displayed a non-significant positive association between AAch and AM. These findings contribute nuanced insights into the differential impacts of teaching methods on student motivation, anxiety, and achievement, underscoring potential areas for educational refinement.

Download Full Text
Responding Author Information

Dr. Pragati Sureka @ pragatijalansureka@gmail.com

Find On

Article Overview

ISSN 2348-5396

ISSN 2349-3429

18.01.293.20251303

10.25215/1303.293

Download: 3

View: 892

Published in   Volume 13, Issue 3, July-September, 2025