OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED
Correlational Study
| Published: April 17, 2026
Understanding The Impact of Sexual and Physical Trauma on Hypermasculinity and Sexual Shame in Men While Finding the Relationship between Hypermasculinity and Sexual Shame
Student, Amity Institute of Behavioral and Allied Sciences, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus
Google Scholar
More about the auther
Assistant Professor, Amity Institute of Behavioral and Allied Sciences, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus
Google Scholar
More about the auther
DIP: 18.01.003.20261402
DOI: 10.25215/1402.003
ABSTRACT
This study understands the impact of sexual and physical trauma on hypermasculinity and sexual shame in men. Males who experience any form of sexual and physical abuse often face a unique, silent struggle that remains under-researched, while the society often pressures men to be “tough” initiators who never show weakness which can lead them to adopt a mask of hypermasculinity (an exaggerated, hardened persona used to stay in control and hide vulnerability), men often end up with a painful feeling of sexual shame that something is fundamentally wrong with their sexual self. By exploring these links, this study aims to help counsellors look past the surface-level “armor” and provide more compassionate, effective support for men trying to heal from their past. The survey consists of 200 men, aged between 20 to 40 years, using the Sexual and Physical Abuse Questionnaire (SPAQ), the Hypermasculinity Index-Revised (HMI-R) and the Male Sexual Shame Scale (MSSS) which measures sexual shame on the basis of six dimensions including sexual inexperience distress, masturbation/pornography remorse, libido distain, body dissatisfaction, dystonic sexual-actualization and sexual performance insecurity. The goal is to see if men who have experienced abuse scored higher in these areas than men who have not experienced any form of abuse. Statistical analysis of the data was done using a t-test, after dividing the data into two groups, Group A consisting of men who have not experienced any form of sexual or physical abuse and Group B consisting of men who have experienced some form of sexual or physical abuse. According to the obtained results, the student researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis, which means there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups for hypermasculinity or sexual shame. Interestingly, hypermasculinity scores were very similar for almost everyone, suggesting that “acting tough” is a universal “psychological armor” men use to hide distress. However, sexual shame scores were very “noisy” and different for everyone, showing that shame is a deeply personal experience that a simple trauma label can’t fully explain. Additionally, a secondary correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between hypermasculinity and sexual shame across the total sample, suggesting that these two psychological constructs operate independently in this population.
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2026, Ahuja, K. & Kewalramani, S.
Received: March 22, 2026; Revision Received: April 14, 2026; Accepted: April 17, 2026
Article Overview
ISSN 2348-5396
ISSN 2349-3429
18.01.003.20261402
10.25215/1402.003
Download: 7
View: 180
Published in Volume 14, Issue 2, April-June, 2026
