OPEN ACCESS

PEER-REVIEWED

Correlational Study

| Published: April 17, 2026

Understanding The Impact of Sexual and Physical Trauma on Hypermasculinity and Sexual Shame in Men While Finding the Relationship between Hypermasculinity and Sexual Shame

Kamya Ahuja

Student, Amity Institute of Behavioral and Allied Sciences, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus Google Scholar More about the auther

, Dr. Soni Kewalramani

Assistant Professor, Amity Institute of Behavioral and Allied Sciences, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus Google Scholar More about the auther

DIP: 18.01.003.20261402

DOI: 10.25215/1402.003

ABSTRACT

This study understands the impact of sexual and physical trauma on hypermasculinity and sexual shame in men. Males who experience any form of sexual and physical abuse often face a unique, silent struggle that remains under-researched, while the society often pressures men to be “tough” initiators who never show weakness which can lead them to adopt a mask of hypermasculinity (an exaggerated, hardened persona used to stay in control and hide vulnerability), men often end up with a painful feeling of sexual shame that something is fundamentally wrong with their sexual self. By exploring these links, this study aims to help counsellors look past the surface-level “armor” and provide more compassionate, effective support for men trying to heal from their past. The survey consists of 200 men, aged between 20 to 40 years, using the Sexual and Physical Abuse Questionnaire (SPAQ), the Hypermasculinity Index-Revised (HMI-R) and the Male Sexual Shame Scale (MSSS) which measures sexual shame on the basis of six dimensions including sexual inexperience distress, masturbation/pornography remorse, libido distain, body dissatisfaction, dystonic sexual-actualization and sexual performance insecurity. The goal is to see if men who have experienced abuse scored higher in these areas than men who have not experienced any form of abuse. Statistical analysis of the data was done using a t-test, after dividing the data into two groups, Group A consisting of men who have not experienced any form of sexual or physical abuse and Group B consisting of men who have experienced some form of sexual or physical abuse. According to the obtained results, the student researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis, which means there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups for hypermasculinity or sexual shame. Interestingly, hypermasculinity scores were very similar for almost everyone, suggesting that “acting tough” is a universal “psychological armor” men use to hide distress. However, sexual shame scores were very “noisy” and different for everyone, showing that shame is a deeply personal experience that a simple trauma label can’t fully explain. Additionally, a secondary correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship between hypermasculinity and sexual shame across the total sample, suggesting that these two psychological constructs operate independently in this population.

Download Full Text
Responding Author Information

Kamya Ahuja @ ahujakamya13@gmail.com

Find On

Article Overview

ISSN 2348-5396

ISSN 2349-3429

18.01.003.20261402

10.25215/1402.003

Download: 7

View: 180

Published in   Volume 14, Issue 2, April-June, 2026