OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED
Comparative Study
| Published: September 25, 2016
Gender Differences in Prosocial Behaviour
MA Psychology, School of Arts and Languages, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India Google Scholar More about the auther
Assistant Professor - Psychology, School of Arts and Languages, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India Google Scholar More about the auther
DIP: 18.01.017/20160304
DOI: 10.25215/0304.017
ABSTRACT
The objective of current research was to examine the gender differences in prosocial behaviour. Total 60 students (N = 60, 30 Males and 30 Females) participated in the current study from Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India. The Prosocial Personality Battery (PSB) consisting seven dimensions including social responsibility (SR), emphatic concern (EC), perspective taking (PT), personal distress (PD), other oriented moral reasoning (O), mutual concern moral reasoning (M) and self report altruism (SRA) has been used in the study to collect the data. The results revealed significant gender differences on two dimensions of prosocial personality battery, i.e. perspective taking (t = 2.04, p <.05) and other oriented moral reasoning (t = 2.01, p <.05), being females on the higher side. On rest of the five dimensions the differences were negligible falling far away from the probability level of .05. The results suggest that males and females are both almost equal on most of the prosocial behaviour dimensions. However, in case of perspective taking and mutual concern moral reasoning females are on higher side suggesting that they have better understanding of others’ mental state and they are more concerned about morality in the society.
Keywords
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2016 I IA Abdullahi, P Kumar
Received: July 05, 2016; Revision Received: August 15, 2016; Accepted: September 25, 2016
Article Overview
ISSN 2348-5396
ISSN 2349-3429
18.01.017/20160304
10.25215/0304.017
Download: 121
View: 2203
Published in Volume 03, Issue 4, July-September, 2016