OPEN ACCESS

PEER-REVIEWED

Cognitive Study

| Published: March 18, 2019

Measurement in Psychology: Assumptions, Ideology and Alternatives

Umesh L. Bharte

(Ph.D) Assistant Professor, University Department of Applied Psychology, University of Mumbai, India Google Scholar More about the auther

, Namita A. Sarang

Research Scholar, University Department of Applied Psychology, University of Mumbai, India Google Scholar More about the auther

DIP: 18.01.096/20190701

DOI: 10.25215/0701.096

ABSTRACT

Efforts at equating measurement with scientificity of a discipline have been made since long in the history of psychology. Alongside the initial pioneering attempts by psychologists, the new science of psychometrics instilled renewed interest in the measurement issues resulting in the growth of modern psychology and thus establishing psychology from mere philosophical speculation to a more structured discipline. Although much progress has been made at quantifying psychological attributes, psychometrics has not remained insulated from criticism. Building on the earlier critiques, this paper contests some of the core assumptions of psychometrics such as (a) psychological attributes are measurable; (b) “measurement is the assignment of numerals to objects and events according to rule (Stevens, 1946, p. 667)”. Further, the ideology behind the promotion and implications of such quantifying endeavours on the part of psychologists to the field of personality assessment are critically assessed.

Download Full Text
Responding Author Information

Namita A. Sarang @ nsarang94@gmail.com

Find On

Article Overview

ISSN 2348-5396

ISSN 2349-3429

18.01.096/20190701

10.25215/0701.096

Download: 21

View: 879

Published in   Volume 07, Issue 1, January-March, 2019