OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED
Comparative Study
| Published: March 30, 2017
Meditation and Locus of Control in Relation to Altitude
Phd scholar, AIPS, Amity University, Noida, India Google Scholar More about the auther
Associate professor, AIPS, Amity University Noida, India Google Scholar More about the auther
Director, AIPS, Amity University Noida, India Google Scholar More about the auther
DIP: 18.01.184/20170402
DOI: 10.25215/0402.184
ABSTRACT
The present study analyses the effect of meditation on locus of control of two groups(regular practitioners of meditation and non meditators) at two different altitudes (2535ft and 13500ft above sea level). The two groups comprised of Buddhist monks/Regular practitioners of meditation) and some locals in Yol Cantt (2535ft) and Lamayuru (13500ft). In the study it has been hypothesized that group one (Buddhist monks/Regular practitioners of meditation) at both the altitudes are inclined towards internal locus of control (internalism) whereas the second group is more inclined towards external locus of control (externalism). Total 100 individuals, 25 monks and 25 laymen from both areas were assessed by administering Rotter’s locus of control scale. Self-reported responses of the subjects were recorded, scored and subjected to ‘t’test analysis. It was established that group practicing regular meditation (monks) is more inclined towards internal locus of control. The study has suggested that the individual practicing meditation at both the altitudes have more inclination towards internal locus of control and non regular practitioner have also shown inclination towards internal locus of control at higher altitude. Subjects who are following some religious practices, creative art etc. also have more of internalism. Internalism is also more prevalent in high altitude.
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2017 Chamoli D, Kumar R Abha Singh
Received: January 31, 2017; Revision Received: March 27, 2017; Accepted: March 30, 2017
Article Overview
ISSN 2348-5396
ISSN 2349-3429
18.01.184/20170402
10.25215/0402.184
Download: 14
View: 1114
Published in Volume 04, Issue 2, January-March, 2017