OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED
Original Study
| Published: March 18, 2025
Exploring the Impact of Mental Boundaries: Stress Perception in Thick Vs. Thin Boundaries
Ph.D Scholar, Galgotias University, Department of Psychology, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Google Scholar
More about the auther
Associate Prof. Department of Psychology, Galgotias University, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Google Scholar
More about the auther
DIP: 18.01.191.20251301
DOI: 10.25215/1301.191
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the influence of mental boundaries, a personality dimension rooted in early psychological concepts, on the perceived stress levels of students. Mental boundaries have been recognised as a barrier protecting against traumatic events (Harrison & Singer, 2014) and offer an intriguing avenue to explore differences in stress perception based on boundary thickness. The aim of this research is to assess the effect of thick and thin boundaries on perceived stress among undergraduate college students. A sample of 420 students was surveyed, using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) developed by Sheldon Cohen and the BQ-sh by David Rawlings. Results indicate that perceived stress was significantly higher among third-year students. Gender differences were observed, with female students exhibiting thinner mental boundaries compared to their male counterparts. Students with higher scores on the PSS were found to correlate with specific BQ-sh subscales, including the need for order, sensitivity, and trust, while displaying lower scores on childlikeness and perceived competence. In conclusion, this study empirically establishes the impact of mental boundaries as a personality dimension on college students’ stress perception. Furthermore, it advocates for a renewed focus on mental boundaries within research as a personality dimension.
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2025, Choudhary, V. & Ansari, S.A.
Received: February 14, 2025; Revision Received: March 14, 2025; Accepted: March 18, 2025
Article Overview
ISSN 2348-5396
ISSN 2349-3429
18.01.191.20251301
10.25215/1301.191
Download: 35
View: 1043
Published in Volume 13, Issue 1, January-March, 2025
