OPEN ACCESS

PEER-REVIEWED

Original Study

| Published: December 31, 2022

Perceptions of Practitioners on Methods, Current Practice, and Barriers: A Descriptive Analysis of Cultural Adaptation of CBT in India

Dr. Sujata Satapathy

M.Phil & Ph.D / Professor, Clinical Psychology, Dept. of Psychiatry, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India. Google Scholar More about the auther

, Hemangi Sanjivini

BPsych(Hnrs)/Research Intern in Psychology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India Google Scholar More about the auther

, Dr. Nimisha Kumar

MA & PhD/CBT Therapist & President, Indian Association of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, New Delhi, India Google Scholar More about the auther

, Dr. Manjula M

M.Phil & Ph.D/ Professor in Clinical Psychology, Dept. of Clinical Psychology, NIMHANS, Hosur Road, Bangaluru,India Google Scholar More about the auther

, Dr. Paulomi Sudhir

M.Phil & Ph.D/Professor in Clinical Psychology, Dept. of Clinical Psychology, NIMHANS, Hosur Road, Bangaluru, India Google Scholar More about the auther

, Dr. Susmita Haldar

M.Phil & Ph.D/Associate Professor, Clinical Psychology, St.Xaviar College, Kolkotta, India Google Scholar More about the auther

DIP: 18.01.145.20221004

DOI: 10.25215/1004.145

ABSTRACT

Background: Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) is noted as the gold standard first-line treatment for various psychopathologies. Nevertheless, the application and practice of CBT widely varies across countries and practitioners. There is little evidence surrounding scientific methods of culturally adapting CBT. This likely results in an overinclusive use of the term CBT and threatens ethical practice. Aim: To examine perspectives of Indian practitioners on CBT practices, beliefs, and attitudes towards cultural/language adaptation of CBT in India. Methods: Adopting an observational design, 83 (response rate of 46%) Indian CBT practitioners participated in an online survey. Information was collected across five-sections: current CBT practice, assessment, barriers, cultural adaption vs culture-focused, method of cultural/language adaptation.  Results: 93% of all CBT sessions were for adults (aged 19-59 years). 90% of practitioners adopted eclectic approaches, out of which 94% mixed techniques most regularly from other therapies. 71% made structural changes to their practice of CBT and 70% reported conducting CBT alongside family therapy. Majority did not use any standardized tools for session progress/therapy-outcome. More than 90% considered cultural adaptation over culture-focused CBT. 69% preferred integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches to cultural/language adaptation with field testing in each state and 93.6% viewed collaboration among Indian CBT practitioners as the method of validation. More than 70% highlighted the lack of CBT research in India. Conclusion: The findings highlighted the need for practice/ethical guidelines for CBT in India, a standardised Indian CBT with rigorous field testing (using robust cultural and language adaptation methods) and due emphasis on CBT supervised practice during education and training.

Download Full Text
Responding Author Information

Hemangi Sanjivini @ hemajain2008@gmail.com

Find On

Article Overview

ISSN 2348-5396

ISSN 2349-3429

18.01.145.20221004

10.25215/1004.145

Download: 13

View: 511

Published in   Volume 10, Issue 4, October-December, 2022