OPEN ACCESS
PEER-REVIEWED
Quantitative Study
| Published: September 30, 2025
Gender Difference in Spatial Ability
Research Scholar, Department of Sports Psychology, School of Sports Sciences, Central University of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, India
Google Scholar
More about the auther
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Department of Psychology, St Joseph’s College, Devagiri, Calicut, Kerala, India.
Google Scholar
More about the auther
DIP: 18.01.405.20251303
DOI: 10.25215/1303.405
ABSTRACT
The present study investigated gender differences in spatial ability using both standardized assessment and real-life perceptual tasks. A total of 70 university students (35 males and 35 females) were assessed using the Spatial Subtest of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II (MAB-II) and two real-world size estimation tasks involving vertical and horizontal spatial perception. Results revealed a statistically significant gender difference in the MAB-II spatial scores, with males outperforming females. However, in the real-life perceptual tasks, the results were mixed. Females showed significantly better performance in horizontal size perception and slightly better, though not statistically significant, accuracy in vertical size perception. These findings suggest that while males may have an advantage in abstract spatial reasoning, females may demonstrate superior spatial perception in ecologically valid, real-world contexts. The study highlights the multifaceted nature of spatial ability and underscores the importance of using diverse measurement approaches. Educational implications and the need for gender-sensitive training programs in spatial skill development are discussed.
Keywords
Spatial Ability, Gender Difference, MAB-II, Size Perception, Mental Rotation, Spatial Cognition
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2025, Nishada, R. K. & George, S.V.
Received: July 15, 2025; Revision Received: September 26, 2025; Accepted: September 30, 2025
Article Overview
ISSN 2348-5396
ISSN 2349-3429
18.01.405.20251303
10.25215/1303.405
Download: 7
View: 653
Published in Volume 13, Issue 3, July-September, 2025
